Pneumothoraces in a Neonatal Tertiary Care Unit: Case Series

 
 

Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi*

 
  DOI 10.5001/omj.2013.61  
 
 
 

Professor in Pediatrics and Child Health, Consultant Pediatrician, Head of the Department, Department of Pediatrics, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq.

Received: 16 Mar 2013
Accepted: 24 Apr 2013

*Address correspondence and reprints request to: Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi, MB, CH.B, DCH, FICMS (Pediatrics) Professor in Pediatrics and Child Health, Consultant Pediatrician, Head of the Department, Department of Pediatrics, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq.
E-mail: mdalmendalawi@yahoo.com
 
 
 
 

How to cite this article

Al-Mendalawi. Pneumothoraces in a Neonatal Tertiary Care Unit: Case Series. Oman Med J 2013 May; 28(3):222.

How to cite this URL

Al-Mendalawi. Pneumothoraces in a Neonatal Tertiary Care Unit: Case Series. Oman Med J 2013 May; 28(3):222. Available from http://www.omjournal.org/fultext_PDF.aspx?DetailsID=386&type=fultext

 
 


To the Editor,

I have 2 comments on the interesting paper by Ali et al.1

First, Ali et al1 stated that 50% of their studied neonates were on ventilators when pneumothorax (PN) occurred. This frequency is alarmingly high compared to that reported in other developing countries. Further elucidation of that issue by Ali et al1 considering type of ventilation and risk factors contributing to ventilator-associated PN in their studied cohort was solicited. PN has been noticed to develop in 26% of neonates under ventilation. The most common type of ventilation leading to PN was found to be synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in 51%. Conventional ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were seen in 35% and 12.3% of PN, respectively. Also, male sex, prematurity, birth weight below 2500g, cesarean section (CS), and negative history of surfactant therapy were risk factors of ventilator- associated neonatal PN.2

Second, despite the limited number of neonates in Ali et al's studied cohort,1 they recommended better selection of mothers and waiting until 37 weeks before performing elective CS as that will influence the PN risk. I presume that that point needs further clarification. Actually, the contribution of CS timing to the evolution of PN in full term or preterm babies compared to those delivered vaginally has been recently addressed in a Norwegian study. Among the 26,664 neonates born at term (≥37th gestational week), 4,546 were delivered by CS (17.0%), of whom 0.5% by elective and 0.6% by emergency CS with NP. The incidence of diagnosed NP was significantly higher after CS than after vaginal delivery (0.6% vs. 0.10%, p<0.001). In addition, the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) was significantly increased (0.41% vs. 0.19%; p=0.01) but the use of CPAP was not (0.28% vs. 0.15%; p=0.08). Among 2,694 neonates born preterm (<37th gestational week), 1,266 were delivered by CS (47.0%). The incidence of diagnosed NP was 2.05% when delivered by CS but only 0.63% when delivered vaginally (p<0.01). Among the preterm infants delivered by CS, 17.7% needed CPAP compared to 6.9% when delivered vaginally (p<0.001) and MV was required for 8.1% and 3.7% (p<0.001), respectively. Among neonates delivered at term or moderately preterm (30-36 weeks) by CS, the incidence of NP and other respiratory problems was significantly increased.3


References

1. Ali R, Ahmed S, Qadir M, Maheshwari P, Khan R. Pneumothoraces in a neonatal tertiary care unit: case series. Oman Med J 2013 Jan;28(1):67-69.

2. Afzali N, Malek AR. Pneumothorax after Mechanical Ventilation in Neonates. Iran J Radiol 2010;7(S1):14.

3. Benterud T, Sandvik L, Lindemann R. Cesarean section is associated with more frequent pneumothorax and respiratory problems in the neonate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88(3):359-361.