original article

Oman Medical Journal [2017], Vol. 32, No. 5: 396-402

Pertussis and Pertussis like Illness: Pediatric Experience in Oman

Amal Al Maani1*, Abdullah Al Qayoudhi1, Hanan Fawzi Nazir2, Heba Omar3, Amina Al Jardani4, Zakariya Al Muharrmi5 and Yasser Wali2

1Unit of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Child Health Department, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman

2Child Health Department, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt

3Endemic Medicine and Hepatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University,Cairo, Egypt

4Microbiology Department, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman

5Microbiology Department, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman

article info

Abstract

Objectives: A resurgence of pertussis or whooping cough has been observed worldwide despite broad vaccination coverage. Pertussis like illness (PLI) refers to a clinical syndrome compatible with pertussis infection but lacking laboratory confirmation or an epidemiological link to a confirmed case. Our study aimed to estimate the contribution of Bordetella pertussis infection and identifying predictors of its diagnosis in a cohort of children with PLI. Methods: Demographic and clinical information were retrospectively collected from the medical records of children < 13 years old and hospitalized for PLI in two pediatric units in Oman from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013. The laboratory data of all cases were reviewed and confirmed cases of pertussis were identified, analyzed, and compared with non-confirmed cases. Results: A total of 131 patients were enrolled in this study. The majority (95.4% [125/131]) were infants. Only 54.1% (71/131) of admitted children with PLI were tested for pertussis. The incidence of pertussis infection among the tested group was 16.9% (12/71) with a 95% confidence interval 8.2−25.6. Severe illness occurred in 56.4% (74/131) of patients, and six were confirmed to have pertussis. Pediatric intensive care unit admission was required for one confirmed case of pertussis and eight cases from the PLI group (three were negative for pertussis, and five were not tested). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis revealed that a white blood cell count ≥ 23.5 × 109/L had 96.6% specificity and lymphocytes ≥ 17 × 109/L had 98.3% specificity. Conclusions: Taking into consideration that the number tested for pertussis was limited, the incidence of pertussis was 16.9% (12 out of 71 patients). Lymphocytosis can be used as a reliable predictor for the diagnosis of pertussis especially in the absence of specific confirmatory tests or until their results are available.

The clinical presentation of pertussis or whooping cough is widely variable, and many patients might have atypical presentations. The classical triad of paroxysmal cough, inspiratory whoop, and posttussive vomiting in the presence of prolonged cough lasting more than two weeks may not be present in all cases, particularly in young infants.1−3 The term pertussis like illness (PLI) has been widely used as a clinical diagnosis in children presenting with symptoms and signs compatible with pertussis without history of exposure to a confirmed case or in the absence of etiological confirmation.4,5

Laboratory diagnosis of pertussis requires the collection of a nasopharyngeal swab or aspirate for culture and/or molecular diagnosis using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The culture is highly specific, but sensitivity is frequently limited by inadequate specimen collection, prior use of antibiotics, and transport procedures. The turnaround time for the culture may be as long as 14 days.5,6 Recently, real-time PCR (RT-PCR) has been introduced for rapid diagnosis of pertussis and is considered the gold standard.7

In Oman, pertussis diagnosis and reporting were based mostly on clinical criteria due to the unavailability of confirmatory tests in most of the health care facilities and technical difficulties with collection of samples and transport. Since 2012, the microbiology labs in the Royal Hospital (RH) and Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) have had in-house culture and PCR to diagnose pertussis.

This study was conducted to determine the incidence of confirmed pertussis cases within a cohort of children hospitalized for PLI. The study also looked into other potential causes of PLI, severity of disease, and possible predictors of the diagnosis.

Methods

Children < 13 years of age admitted from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013 with the diagnosis of PLI or pertussis in the two tertiary care facilities in Oman (RH and SQUH, both in Muscat) were included. Ethical approval was obtained from both centers.

Retrospective data were collected from the electronic patient records of the participants and included patients’ demographics, date of admission, length of stay, duration of symptoms, cough type, history of contact, vaccination status, white blood cell (WBC) count, lymphocyte count, diagnostic tools, complications of the disease, and the outcomes. In both centers, patients with mild to moderate illness were admitted to the general ward, but those requiring close monitoring and assisted oxygenation or noninvasive ventilation were placed in the high dependency unit (HDU). The children with hemodynamic instability or requiring invasive ventilation were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Admission to the HDU and PICU were considered an indicator of severe illness.

For pertussis laboratory diagnosis in both units, pertussis culture and/or PCR were used. Nasopharyngeal alginate swabs tipped in charcoal transport medium and/or aspirates were used. Swabs were inoculated as soon as possible into Charcoal Agar (Oxoid CM0119) with Bordetella Selective Supplement (Oxoid SR0082). Plates were incubated at 35 °C with enhanced humidity. Positive cultures were confirmed by the use of agglutination sera (Remel) to identify Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis. Samples were also subjected to multiplex RT-PCR that targeted IS481, IS1001, and ptx A genes.

Respiratory samples (nasopharyngeal swabs, throat swabs, or nasal aspirate) were sent in viral transport medium for viruses to detect other pathogens that mimic or are associated with pertussis. Respiratory virus diagnosis was obtained by subjecting the sample to multiplex RT-PCR using respiratory viral panels from fast-track diagnostics for detection of influenza A, influenza A (H1N1), influenza B, coronaviruses NL63, 229E and HKU1, parainfluenza 1, 2 , 3, and 4, human metapneumovirus A and B, rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial A and B, adenovirus, enterovirus, Parechovirus, bocavirus, and mycoplasma pneumonia.

The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS Statistics (SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago). Descriptive analysis was used to describe the demographic and physical characteristics of the patients. The frequency and percentage were used to present the categorical outcome variables, while mean and standard deviation were applied to describe the continuous variables. A confidence interval (CI) of 95% was used to estimate the incidence of pertussis among admitted patients. Further analysis of data was applied by using split variables. The patients were divided into three groups: pertussis positive, pertussis negative, and untested. A chi-square test was used to determine the association between whooping, paroxysmal cough, cyanosis, leukocytosis, lymphocytosis, frequency of vaccination, and pertussis. The leukocyte and lymphocyte count distributions between pertussis positive and pertussis negative patients were compared using the two-tailed Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. The diagnostic performance of lymphocytic count in the prediction of pertussis diagnosis was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the curves (AUROC) and the 95% CI were used as indices of accuracy ROC curve.

Results

A total of 131 patients were admitted in both hospitals with the diagnosis of PLI and/or pertussis. This group represents 29.8% (131/439) of the nationally reported cases within same period [Figure 1]. The demographic characteristics of the studied patients are shown in Table 1. The results showed an increase in the admission of infants younger than one-year-old (95.4%), especially those under four months (75.5%). The majority (60.3%) of infants were females. Patients came from five different governorates, but mostly from the Muscat region (61.8%). The vaccination status of two patients in the positive group was unknown, but there were no confirmed infections in those who had completed their vaccinations.

Figure 1: Reported pertussis cases in Oman from 1981 to 2014 and vaccination coverage. Pertussis vaccination with whole-cell diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine (DTP) started in 1981 with launch of the Expanded Program of Immunization. A progress decline in passively reported cases to the Ministry of Health were noted with increase vaccination coverage. Outbreaks continued to occur in highly immunized population every 4−5 years. This figure has been reproduced with permission from the communicable Diseases Manual, 3rd edition, 2017, produced by the Directorate General for Disease Surveillance and Control, MOH, Sultanate of Oman.

Table 1: Demographic features of 131 included child with pertussis like illness, n (%).

Characteristics

Total

n = 131

Pertussis positive cohort

n = 12

Pertussis negative cohort

n = 59

Pertussis untested cohort

n = 60

Gender

Male

52 (39.6)

7 (58.3)

22 (37.2)

23 (38.3)

Female

79 (60.3)

5 (41.6)

37 (62.7)

37 (61.6)

Age group

< 2 months

49 (37.4)

4 (33.3)

25 (42.3)

20 (33.3)

2−4 months

50 (38.1)

7 (58.3)

18 (30.5)

25 (41.6)

4−6 months

14 (10.6)

1 (8.3)

5 (8.4)

8 (13.3)

6−8 months

6 (4.5)

-

4 (6.7)

2 (3.3)

8−12 months

6 (4.5)

-

3 (5.0)

3 (5.0)

1−2 years

1 (0.7)

-

-

1 (1.6)

2−5 years

4 (3.0)

-

3 (5.0)

1 (1.6)

5−13 years

1 (0.7)

-

1 (1.6)

-

Admitting center

Royal Hospital

71 (54.1)

9 (75.0)

29 (49.1)

33 (55.0)

Sultan Qaboos University Hospital

60 (45.8)

3 (25.0)

30 (50.8)

27 (45.0)

Pertussis vaccination

Yes

54 (41.2)

5 (41.6)

25 (42.3)

24 (40.0)

One dose

30 (55.5)

4 (80.0)

15 (60.0)

11 (45.8)

two dose

11 (20.3)

1 (20.0)

4 (16.0)

6 (25.0)

Three dose

13 (24.0)

-

6 (24.0)

7 (29.1)

No

61 (46.5)

5 (41.6)

28 (47.4)

28 (46.6)

No significant difference was observed between the tested cohort of patients (whether proven to be positive for pertussis or not) and the non-tested cohort regarding the clinical diagnostic criteria for pertussis/PLI (paroxysms of cough, whoop, posttussive vomiting, apnea, cyanosis, and fever) or epidemiological linkage contact with laboratory confirmed case of pertussis [Table 2].

Table 2: Clinical and laboratory features of studied cohort, n (%).

 

Frequency

n = 131

Pertussis positive cohort

n = 12

Pertussis negative cohort

n = 59

Pertussis untested cohort

n = 60

p-value

Epidemiological linkage contact with laboratory confirmed case of pertussis

Yes

70 (53.4)

9 (75.0)

29 (49.1)

32 (53.3)

0.895

No

34 (25.9)

1 (8.3)

17 (28.8)

16 (26.6)

 

Unknown

27 (20.6)

2 (16.6)

13 (22.0)

12 (20.0)

 

Clinical criteria

Paroxysms of coughing

121 (92.3)

12 (100.0)

54 (91.5)

55 (91.6)

0.579

Inspiratory whoop

9 (6.8)

2 (16.6)

5 (8.4)

2 (3.3)

0.201

Posttussive vomiting

62 (47.3)

4 (33.3)

29 (49.1)

29 (48.3)

0.593

Apnea

61 (46.5)

8 (66.6)

26 (44.0)

27 (45.0)

0.340

Cyanosis

58 (44.2)

8 (66.6)

23 (38.9)

27 (45.0)

0.210

Fever

41 (31.2)

3 (25.0)

21 (35.5)

17 (28.3)

0.641

Respiratory viral infection

Not tested

42 (32.0)

5 (41.6)

12 (20.3)

25 (41.6)

 

Negative

31 (23.6)

2 (16.6)

8 (13.5)

21 (35.0)

 

Respiratory syncytial virus

18 (13.7)

-

15 (25.4)

3 (5.0)

 

Enterovirus

2 (1.5)

-

2 (3.3)

-

 

Rhinovirus

16 (12.2)

3 (25.0)

9 (15.2)

4 (6.6)

 

Adenovirus

3 (2.2)

1 (8.3)

-

2 (3.3)

 

Dual infection

11 (8.3)

-

9 (15.2)

2 (3.3)

 

Other viruses*

8 (6.1)

1 (8.3)

4 (6.7)

3 (5.0)

 

Site of admission

         

General ward/PHD/PICU

57/65/9

6/5/1

27/29/3

24/31/5

0.901

Admission season#

Fall

37 (28.2)

1 (8.3)

23 (38.9)

13 (21.6)

0.001

Winter

30 (22.9)

3 (25.0)

11 (18.6)

16 (26.6)

 

Spring

24 (18.3)

2 (16.6)

3 (5.0)

19 (31.6)

 

*Other virus (coronavirus OC43, NL63, HKU1, influenza A and B, bocavirus, parainfluenza 3).
PHD: pediatric high dependency; PICU: pediatric intensive care unit;
#Fall: From September 23 to December 20; Winter: from December 21 to March 20; Spring: From March 21 to June 21; Summer: From June 21 to September 22.
p-value positive and negative groups.

Over half (56.4%) of patients in the study group required admission to the HDU or PICU, and six (8.1%) were confirmed to have pertussis. Only one confirmed pertussis case within the study group was in the PICU compared to three from the pertussis negative cohort, a further five were untested [Table 2].

Most of the admissions for PLI occurred during the summer from 21 June to 22 September (30.5%). For the confirmed pertussis negative group, 38.9% of cases were admitted during the fall (from 23 September to 20 December).

Of the 131 patients clinically suspected to have pertussis, 71 (54.1%) were actually tested; 23.9% (17/71) of the tested samples were sent for pertussis culture, 50.7% were sent for PCR (36/71), while 25.3% (18/71) of the patients were tested with both culture and PCR [Table 3].

The incidence of confirmed cases of pertussis infection among patients who were admitted with PLI and were tested for pertussis was 16.9% (12/71; 95% CI 8.2−25.6).

Respiratory viral infection was investigated for seven cases of the pertussis positive cohort and 47 of the pertussis negative cohort. A viral etiology was identified in 80.8% (38/47) of the pertussis negative group. The most frequently detected virus in the pertussis positive group was rhinovirus (42.8%) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in the pertussis negative group (31.9%).

Both leukocyte and lymphocyte counts were significantly higher in the pertussis positive than the pertussis negative group (23.6±13.3 vs. 12.6±5.2, p = < 0.001 and 16.8±9.7 vs. 7.9±3.8, p < 0.001, respectively) [Table 3].

Table 3: Subgroup analysis for the pertussis-tested cohort.

 

Pertussis positive

n = 12

Pertussis negative

n = 59

p-value

Confirmatory test

Culture only

2

15

n/a

PCR only

5

31

n/a

PCR + culture

5

13

n/a

WBC

23.6 ± 13.3

12.6 ± 5.2

< 0.001

WBC: white blood cells; PCR: polymerase chain reaction;
n/a: non-applicable.
Values expressed as mean
±standard deviation.

The ROC curve analysis was constructed to obtain the sensitivity and specificity of leukocyte and lymphocyte counts at varying cutoff levels [Figure 2] in detecting true pertussis cases.

Figure 2: Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the diagnostic power of leucocyte (blue) and lymphocyte (red) counts in predicting a pertussis diagnosis.

The WBC at a cutoff of 23.5 × 109/L yielded 96.6% specificity and 50.0% sensitivity (AUROC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62−0.96). Lymphocyte count at a cutoff 17 × 109/L yielded 98.3% specificity and 41.0% sensitivity (AUROC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68−0.97).

Discussion

The current study was conducted at a time when there was worldwide concern regarding increased cases of pertussis.8 At a national level, it was also noticed that the frequency of reported clinical cases of pertussis was on the rise [Figure 1].

Of the 71 tested PLI cases, 12 (16.9%) were confirmed as pertussis. This figure is higher compared to a similar study done in Iran that included 174 cases of PLI in children over four years (2008−2012), and only 13.2% were confirmed to have pertussis.5 Since not all patients were tested, 16.9% could be an underestimate of the exact contribution of Bordetella pertussis infection to the cohort. In addition, the confirmatory test used in 23.9% of the tested cases was pertussis culture alone, which can have high false negative results because of inadequate specimen collection, prior use of antibiotics, and inappropriate transport procedures.5,6

A viral etiology was identified in 80.8% of the pertussis negative group, which included mainly RSV and rhinovirus among other respiratory viruses. However, this may have been underestimated as 12 cases were not tested for viral etiology. It is plausible to say that RSV was the most common mimicker of pertussis infection in our cohort. This can also explain the increase in admission from September to December for the pertussis negative group, which corresponds with the respiratory viral infection season in the country.9

All children with PLI included in this study were in-patients. More than 95% were infants, and 75.5% were under four months old. This is not surprising considering the vulnerability of this age group for all kinds of infections because of their immature immune system in addition to the fact that pertussis immunity is usually achieved with the third vaccination dose given at six months. A study conducted in Tunisia also reported that 20% of affected children were younger than six months old and had received less than three doses of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine (DTP).10

The recently witnessed large-scale outbreaks of pertussis in developed countries have initiated a vigorous debate on the efficacy of vaccines, immunization schedule, and demographic factors. The common feature in the reported outbreaks from Australia, New Zealand, UK, and USA have been the exclusive use of acellular pertussis vaccine in all these places.11 In Oman’s national immunization program, the whole-cell pertussis vaccine is used for infants and incorporated within Penta (ARAPENTA 01VC130; HBV, DTP, and Hib) at two, four, and six months of age with no further booster doses. Although in our study the vaccination status of two patients in the positive group was unknown, there was no confirmed infection in those who had completed the pertussis vaccination. Thus, the surge in PLI in our setting is different from the recent epidemic in the Western world and could be mainly related to viruses, other Bordetella species, or due to the waning pertussis immunity in Oman’s adult population.8

Caregivers and other adults in frequent contact with infants are a recognized source of pertussis transmission and should be vaccinated.12 Implementing the “cocooning” strategy — vaccinating people who have contact with infants — can be considered a protective measure for this vulnerable group. Immunizing pregnant women will reduce the risk of acquiring pertussis until the time of delivery, and it gives the infant some protection for approximately one to two months. Another preventive approach would be to start pertussis immunization at a younger age, with shorter intervals between doses. This schedule can start at birth, and the first three doses could be completed by three months of age.8

Of the 131 patients clinically suspected to have pertussis, 74 (56.4%) required either admission to the HDU or PICU for assisted ventilation. Only one patient in the pertussis positive group was admitted to PICU, and there were no reported mortalities. These numbers were considered low when compared to reported figures in other international studies. For example, an audit in Auckland, New Zealand, of confirmed pertussis admissions to the national PICU from 1991 to 2003 showed that out of a total of 72 children, 35 (49.0%) received assisted ventilation, four died, and 19.0% were readmitted.13

More recent data (June 2008−August 2011) from a multicenter study on 127 patients with confirmed pertussis in 25 PICUs across the US, showed that 55 (43.0%) required mechanical ventilation, and 12 patients (9.4%) died during initial hospitalization.14

We found a strong association between the presence of lymphocytosis and confirmed pertussis cases. Guinto-Ocampo et al,15 described the absolute lymphocyte count as the best predictor for pertussis for infants younger than one-year-old, corroborating our findings. Others also linked lymphocytosis to mortalities and morbidities with pertussis infection.16 Murray et al, 17 showed that the median WBC count was significantly higher in those requiring mechanical ventilation, those with pulmonary hypertension, and those who did not survive in a multicenter study in the USA.17

The occurrence of apnea, cyanosis, and whooping cough was more common in patients with pertussis while fever, posttussive vomiting, and pneumonia were more common in patients with PLI. However, this was not statistically significant. In a larger cohort, Ferronato et al,18 reported that whooping cough, cyanosis, a leukocyte count > 20 000 cells/mm3, and a lymphocyte count > 10 000 cells/mm3 were significant predictors of pertussis.

The limitations of this study are its retrospective nature, small sample size, and the inclusion of inpatients only. Milder cases not requiring hospitalization might have been missed. Another limitation was the relatively high number of patients admitted that were not tested for pertussis. Therefore, some of the variables tested as predictors did not show statistical significance.

Conclusion

Taking into consideration that the number of patients tested for pertussis was limited, the incidence of pertussis in the tested patients was 16.9% (12 out of 71 patients). Pertussis remains a clinical diagnosis in our institutions, which makes it hard to detect the true surge of the infection rate. Leukocytosis and lymphocytosis are reliable predictors for the diagnosis of whooping cough.

Disclosure

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. No funding was received for this study.

references

  1. Weisberg SS. Vaccine preventable diseases: current perspectives in historical context, Part II. Dis Mon 2007 Oct;53(10):467-528.
  2. 2. Cone TC Jr. Whooping cough is first described as a disease sui generis by Baillou in 1640. Pediatrics 1970 Oct;46(4):522.
  3. 3. Munoz FM. Pertussis in infants, children, and adolescents: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 2006 Jan;17(1):14-19.
  4. 4. Mattoo S, Cherry JD. Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005 Apr;18(2):326-382.
  5. 5. Shojaei J, Saffar M, Hashemi A, Ghorbani G, Rezai M, Shahmohammadi S. Clinical and laboratory features of pertussis in hospitalized infants with confirmed versus probable pertussis cases. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014 Nov;4(6):910-914.
  6. 6. Hallander HO. Microbiological and serological diagnosis of pertussis. Clin Infect Dis 1999 Jun;28(Suppl 2):S99-S106.
  7. 7. Bidet P, Liguori S, De Lauzanne A, Caro V, Lorrot M, Carol A, et al. Real-time PCR measurement of persistence of Bordetella pertussis DNA in nasopharyngeal secretions during antibiotic treatment of young children with pertussis. J Clin Microbiol 2008 Nov;46(11):3636-3638.
  8. 8. Cherry JD. Epidemic pertussis in 2012–the resurgence of a vaccine-preventable disease. N Engl J Med 2012 Aug;367(9):785-787.
  9. 9. Khamis FA, Al-Kobaisi MF, Al-Areimi WS, Al-Kindi H, Al-Zakwani I. Epidemiology of respiratory virus infections among infants and young children admitted to hospital in Oman. J Med Virol 2012 Aug;84(8):1323-1329.
  10. 10. Zouari A, Smaoui H, Brun D, Njamkepo E, Sghaier S, Zouari E, et al. Prevalence of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis infections in Tunisian hospitalized infants: results of a 4-year prospective study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2012 Apr;72(4):303-317.
  11. 11. Jackson DW, Rohani P. Perplexities of pertussis: recent global epidemiological trends and their potential causes. Epidemiol Infect 2014 Apr;142(4):672-684.
  12. 12. Johns TL, Roetzheim R, Chen R. Predictors of tetanus-diphtheria- acellular pertussis vaccination among adults receiving tetanus vaccine in the United States: data from the 2008 national health interview survey. J Prim Care Community Health 2013 Apr;4(2):95-100.
  13. 13. Surridge J, Segedin ER, Grant CC. Pertussis requiring intensive care. Arch Dis Child 2007 Nov;92(11):970-975.
  14. 14. Berger JT, Carcillo JA, Shanley TP, Wessel DL, Clark A, Holubkov R, et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN). Critical pertussis illness in children: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013 May;14(4):356-365.
  15. 15. Guinto-Ocampo H, Bennett JE, Attia MW. Predicting pertussis in infants. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008 Jan;24(1):16-20.
  16. 16. Pierce C, Klein N, Peters M. Is leukocytosis a predictor of mortality in severe pertussis infection? Intensive Care Med 2000 Oct;26(10):1512-1514.
  17. 17. Murray EL, Nieves D, Bradley JS, Gargas J, Mason WH, Lehman D, et al. Characteristics of Severe Bordetella pertussis Infection Among Infants ≤90 Days of Age Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Units-Southern California, September 2009-June 2011. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2013 Mar;2(1):1-6.
  18. 18. Ferronato AE, Gilio AE, Vieira SE. Respiratory viral infections in infants with clinically suspected pertussis. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2013 Nov-Dec;89(6):549-553.