Diabetic Women with Fever and Right Flank Pain 

 
   Shah Farhan Azfar,1 Farheen Badar,2 Nishat Akhtar,3 Sanna Kirmani2  
 

 

 
  DOI 10.5001/omj.2011.35  
 
 
 
From the 1Department of Internal Medicine, Firoz Hospital, Aligarh, India; 2Department of Radiodiagnosis, Aligarh, India; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aligarh, India

Received: 17 Dec 2010
Accepted: 21 Jan 2011

Address correspondence and reprints request to: Dr. Shah Farhan Azfar, Department of Internal Medicine, Firoz Hospital, Aligarh, India.
E-mail: shahfarhanazfar@gmail.com
 
 
 
 

How to cite this article

Azfar SF, Badar F, Akhtar N, Kirmani S. Diabetic Women with Fever and Right Flank Pain. Oman Med J 2011 March; 26(2):141-142.

How to cite this URL

Azfar SF, Badar F, Akhtar N, Kirmani S. Diabetic Women with Fever and Right Flank Pain. Oman Med J 2011 March; 26(2):141-142. Available from http://www.omjournal.org/fultext_PDF.aspx?DetailsID=89&type=fultext

 
 
 
 

A 61 years old woman with type II diabetes mellitus presented with fever, dysuria, reduced urine output and right flank pain since 5 days, not responding to treatment. There was no history of obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms, hematuria, or trauma. On examination, there was tenderness in the right flank. Laboratory tests revealed a white blood cell count (WBC) of 18,500/mm3 with 81% neutrophils, hemoglobin concentration of 9.7 g/dl, platelet count of 15,010/mm, creatinine level of 3.1 mg/dl and urea concentration of 118 mg/dl.

Urine analysis demonstrated  a 20-25 WBC per high power field. Urine culture showed more than 105 colony-forming units (CFU) per mL of Escherichia coli (E.coli) sensitive to amikacin, ceftriaxone, ofloxacin, nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim. The patient’s abdominal X-ray is shown in Fig 1.

f1

Figure 1: Abdominal X-ray supine view showing REINFORM shape collection of gas in right renal fossa (arrow)

Question

1.  What is the diagnosis?
a.  Loculated pneumoperitoneum b.  Volvulus
c.  Emphysematous pyelonephritis d.  Toxic megacolon
e.  None of the above
2.  Which investigation to do next?

Answers

1.  Emphysematous pyelonephritis
2.  Computed tomography (CT) Abdomen

Discussion

Plain X-ray of abdomen showed a reniform shaped air collection in right renal fossa which was confirmed with CT Abdomen in our patient (Fig 2).

f2

Figure 2: Contrast CT abdomen shows collection of air and fluid in renal parenchyma as well as perinephric space.

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) has been defined as a necrotizing infection of the renal parenchyma and its surrounding areas that results in the presence of gas in the renal parenchyma, collecting system or the perinephric tissue. More than 90% of cases occur in patients with diabetes. The factors that predispose to EPN in patients with diabetes are; poorly controlled diabetes, high levels of glycosylated hemoglobin A(1c), and local cause such as renal tract obstruction (tumors or lithiasis). E. coli and Klebsiella are the most commonly involved pathogens and mixed organisms are observed in 10% of the cases.1

Abdominal radiograph, Intravenous urography and ultrasound can detect EPN by demonstrating the presence of gas. Ultrasound demonstrates  presence of  multiple echogenic foci with  dirty shadowing due to  reverberation  artifacts. However,  gas within the kidney or renal pelvis can mimic renal calculi. Computerized tomography (CT) is the procedure of choice which is both a highly sensitive and a specific method for demonstrating intrarenal air and for characterizing the location and extent of that air (intracalyceal, intraparenchymal, perinephric, or pararenal), and thus planning the management. A CT classification of emphysematous pyelonephritis proposed by Wan et al. has prognostic significance.2

Two staging systems, based on CT findings, have been proposed for prognostic and therapeutic reasons. Wan et al. described two types. Type  I- the  classical form, includes patients  showing parenchymal destruction with streaky or mottled gas but with no fluid collection. These patients have had a high mortality rate of 69%. Whereas, type II EPN is defined either as the presence of renal or perirenal fluid in association with a bubbly or loculated gas pattern, or gas in the collecting system with acute bacterial nephritis or renal or perirenal fluid-containing abscesses, which has a better prognosis than type I EPN.

Conclusion

The treatment of EPN  remains controversial and nephrectomy is still the treatment of choice in severe cases. However, energetic management with more efficient antibiotics such as trimethoprim, cephalosporins, nitrofurantoin, or a fluoroquinolone, along with correction of fluid electrolyte imbalance, effective diabetic control and CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of EPN was found to be a safe, quick and life-saving alternative to surgery, especially in type 2 EPN and in cases of single kidney or in an inoperable high-risk patient.3 But in cases of PCD failure, immediate nephrectomy should not be delayed for successful management of EPN.

Acknowledgements

The authors reported no conflict of interest and no funding was received on this work.

 
 


References
 
 

1.   Huang JJ,  Tseng CC. Emphysematous pyelonephritis:  clinicoradiological classification, management, prognosis, and pathogenesis. Arch Intern Med 2000 Mar;160(6):797-805.
2.   Wan  YL, Lee TY, Bullard MJ, Tsai CC. Acute  gas-producing bacterial renal infection: correlation between imaging findings and clinical outcome. Radiology 1996 Feb;198(2):433-438.
3.  Chan PH, Kho VK, Lai SK, Yang CH, Chang HC, Chiu B, et al. Treatment of emphysematous pyelonephritis with  broad-spectrum antibacterials and percutaneous renal drainage: an analysis of 10 patients. J Chin Med Assoc 2005 Jan; 68(1):29-32.