Proportion of Urinary Schistosomiasis among HIV-Infected Subjects in Benin City, Nigeria

 
 

Akinbo Frederick Olusegun1*, Okaka Christopher Ehis2, Omoregie Richard3

 
  DOI 10.5001/omj.2011.42  
 
 
 
1Department of Pathology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria
2Department of Animal and Environmental Biology, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
3School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria

Received: 27 Jan 2011
Accepted: 19 Mar 2011

*Address correspondence and reprints request to: Dr. Akinbo Frederick Olusegun, Department of Pathology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
E-mail: fgbengang@yahoo.com
 
 
 
 

How to cite this Article

Olusegun AF, Ehis OC, Richard O. Proportion of Urinary Schistosomiasis among HIV-Infected Subjects in Benin City, Nigeria. Oman Med J 2011 March; 26(3):175-177.

How to cite this URL

Olusegun AF, Ehis OC, Richard O. Proportion of Urinary Schistosomiasis among HIV-Infected Subjects in Benin City, Nigeria. Oman Med J 2011 March; 26(3):175-177. Available from http://www.omjournal.org/fultext_PDF.aspx?DetailsID=97&type=fultext

 
 
 
 

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, and the effect of CD4+ T cell counts and demographics on its prevalence among HIV-positive patients in Benin City, Nigeria.

Methods: Urine and blood samples were collected from 2000 HIV-positive subjects. A wet preparation of the urine deposit was examined microscopically to identify ova of Schistosoma haematobium. The blood specimens were analyzed using the flow cytometry for CD4 + T-lymphocyte count.

Results: An overall prevalence rate of 0.3% was reported. Gender and CD4 count <200 cells/µL did not affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, while HIV patients that were single had significantly higher prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis (p=0.002).

Conclusion: The prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis among HIV patients in Benin City is low. CD4+ count did not affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis.

Keywords: HIV; Schistosoma haematobium.

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a water-borne disease caused by the trematode Schistosoma and it constitutes one of the most important parasitic diseases of man.1 Schistosoma haematobium alone constitutes a major public health problem in 44 African countries and is endemic in Nigeria.2 Schistosomiasis is regarded as second only to malaria in its socio-economic and public health implications.3 Up to 75% of women infected with urinary schistosomiasis often develop irreversible lesions in the vulva, vagina, cervix and uterus, creating a lasting entering point for HIV. The interaction of female genital schistosomiasis with contribution to HIV transmission was clearly described as early as 1995.4 Schistosomiasis infection has been reported to increase the risk of HIV infection among women due to the fact that this parasite causes genital lesions and sandy patches.5 While the presence of blood and leucocytosis in seminal fluid is expected to promote transmission of HIV infection.4 Several studies on HIV prevalence have shown unexplained gender quotient disfavoring rural women,6 with 1.3 to 6.4 HIV-infected women to every man. The highest HIV prevalence rates in Africa are found in urban and semi-urban areas,6 while Schistosoma haematobium is usually a rural disease as it is transmitted in fresh water bodies where the intermediate host lives. Both diseases meet in migrating populations, travellers, commuting spouses and roadside villages.7 There is little or no report on the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis among HIV-positive patients in Benin City. Against this background, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, effect of CD4+ count and demographics on the prevalence in Benin City, Nigeria.

Methods

The study was conducted at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria between August 2007 to August, 2009. A total of 2000 (668 males and 1332 females) HIV patients attending HIV clinics and 500 (209 males and 291 females) were recruited for this study. The age of the study subjects ranged from 21 to 70 years. Informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to specimen collection. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital.

Urine and blood samples were collected from each patient. Urine samples were collected into screw-capped universal containers and processed as described by Nwosu et al.8 Briefly, 10 ml of urine was transferred into a centrifuge tube and spun for 5 min at 5,000 rpm. The supernatant was discarded and a drop of the resuspended deposit was placed on a clean grease-free slide and covered with a cover slip and examined for the presence of ova of Schistosoma haematobium. The presence of ova of S. haematobium was taken as positive and its absence taken as negative. CD4+ T-lymphocyte count was determined using flow cytometry (Partec, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 20 µL of CD4 PE antibody and 20 µL of well mixed whole EDTA blood was placed in a Partec test tube, mixed gently and incubated in the dark for 15 mins at room temperature. The samples were mixed every 5 mins during incubation. Eight hundred microlitres of CD4 buffer was added and the sample mixed gently and CD4+T cells counted automatically by the machine.

A structured questionnaire was used to obtain demographic information from the study subjects.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using chi square (X2) and odd ratio (OR) analysis. The statistical software INSTAT ® was used for the analysis.

Results

A total of 6 (0.3%) out of 2000 HIV-positive patients had urinary schistosomiasis (Table 1). Gender and CD4+ count <200 cells/µl did not affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, (Table 1). Thus, occupation, level of education, source of water did not affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, while being single (unmarried) resulted in significantly higher prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis (p=0.002). (Table 1)

Table 1: Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in relation to sex, CD4 count and demographics. 

Characteristics

No test

No infected

p value

 Gender

 

 

0.667

 Male

668

3 (0.45)

 

 Female

1332

3 (0.23)

 

 Total

2000

6 (0.30)

 

 CD4 count

 

 

0.773

 <200 cells/µL

255

1 (0.40)

 

 ≥200 cells/µL

1745

5 (0.29)

 

 Clinical Manifestations

 

 

 

 Hematuria

0

0

 

 Fever

461

1

0.710

 Joint pain

22

1

0.089

 Rash

78

1

0.574

 Cough

47

1

0.333

 Weight loss

1107

4

0.883

 Nausea

74

0

0.631

 Vomiting

2

0

0.938

 Educational background

 

 

0.679

 None

57

0

 

 Primary

287

1 (0.04)

 

 Secondary

1281

5 (0.4)

 

 Tertiary

334

0

 

 Marital status

 

 

0.002

 Single

74

2 (2.67)

 

 Married

1897

4 (0.21)

 

 Divorced

22

0

 

 Widowed

6

0

 

 Occupation

 

 

0.748

 Civil servant

221

0

 

 Businessmen/women

169

1(0.59)

 

 Security

16

0

 

 Artisan

427

3(0.70)

 

 Trader

1055

2(0.19)

 

 Farmer

15

0

 

 Housewife

62

0

 

 Student

35

0

 

 Source of water

 

 

0.890

 Pipe borne

34

0

 

 Bore hole

1811

6(0.33)

 

 Well/Rain

133

0

 

 Stream/River

22

0

 

Discussion

Schistosomiasis remains a burden in Africa and a major health problem in developing countries especially the rural communities.8 In many regions of the world, both schistosomiasis and HIV are endemic, resulting in patients harboring co-infections.9 The overall prevalence rate of 0.30% is lower than that observed in other studies. Ndhlovu et al.10 observed a prevalence rate of 33% in Zimbabwe, while Kallestrup et al.11 recorded a prevalence rate of 26.3% in a rural community in Zimbabwe among a population of HIV-infected patients. Okwori and Alao reported a prevalence of 20% among AIDS patients in Otukpo, Nigeria.12 The difference in this current study and that of other authors may be due to locations as urinary schistosomiasis is not common in this locality as 500 HIV sero-negative individuals (controls) were negative for urinary schistosomiasis (data not shown) and that the positive cases may have come from migrating population. Our institution is the South regional centre for the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the Institute for Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN) and we receive HIV patients from many southern states of the country. It is important to note that studies with higher prevalence were conducted in rural settings,10,11 as against ours was conducted in an urban setting.

The prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis did not differ significantly (p=0.667) between both genders. This observation had been noted earlier.13 However, Okwori and Alao reported a significant prevalence in relation to gender. The reason may be due to few numbers of positive cases of schistosomiasis.12 The prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis did not differ significantly (p=0.773) between HIV-positive patients with CD4 count < 200 cells/µl (0.40%) and those with CD4+ count 200 cells/µl (0.29%). The primary defenses against urinary tract infection of which urinary schistosomiasis is one are; low pH, high urine urea concentration and osmolality.14 These three antibacterial properties of urine are not controlled by CD4+ lymphocyte. This may explain the result in this study.

The clinical manifestation noted in this study did not also affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis (p>0.05). Hematuria, which is a strong indication of urinary schistosomiasis was not observed in this study. However, it raises the question of whether or not hematuria should still be used as a clinical diagnostic criterion among HIV-positive patients. Educational background did not affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in this study (p=0.679), a finding inconsistent with a previous report.8 This observation in this study may have been due to small number of positive cases. The effect of marital status on the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis shows that singles have significantly higher prevalence (p=0.002). This may be due to the fact that singles are more likely to visit streams where they may come into contact with cercaria of schistosome. In this study, occupation did not affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, although the reason for this is unclear. However, Nwosu et al.8 and Okoli and Iwuala,15 reported a relationship between the prevalence of schistosomiasis and occupation. The source of water did not affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in this study, as all infected persons had borehole as their source of water. This is an unlikely source for the transmission of urinary schistosomiasis, and may cast doubts on the accuracy of information given in the questionnaire.

Conclusion

Overall, we observed a prevalence of 0.30% of urinary schistosomiasis among HIV-positive patients. Gender did not affect the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis. CD4 count <200 cells/µl did not result in higher prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis among HIV-infected patients while the prevalence was higher among unmarried HIV patients. However, there is still need for further studies to clarify these findings.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge with thanks the Management of University of Benin Teaching Hospital for permission to carry out this study.

 
 
References
 
 

1. Adeonye GO, Akabogu OA. Occurrence of urinary schistosomiasis among residents of Ado-Odo area of Ogun State,Nigeria. Nigerian J Parasitol 1996;17:23-30.

2. WHO.Identification of high-risk communities for control of schistosomiasis in Africa: A multi community study.Social and Economic Research Reports. TAR/ SER/ PRS/ 15. 1995; 83.

3. Anosike JC, Njoku AJ, Nwoke BE, Ajero CM, Osagiede UR, Okoro OU, et al. Epidemiological survey of urinary schistosomiasis in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Inter J Environ Health Human Dev. 2002;3(1):59-65.

4. Feldmeier H, Krantz I, Poggensee G. Female genital schistosomiasis: a neglected risk factor for the transmission of HIV? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1995 Mar-Apr;89(2):237.

5. Kjetland EF, Ndhlovu PD, Gomo E, Mduluza T, Midzi N, Gwanzura L, et al. Association between genital schistosomiasis and HIV in rural Zimbabwean women. AIDS 2006 Feb;20(4):593-600.

6. WHO. UNAIDS. AIDS epidemic update. Geneva: WHO/UNAIDS.2004; 87

7. Serwadda D, Wawer MJ, Musgrave SD, Sewankambo NK, Kaplan JE, Gray RH. HIV risk factors in three geographic strata of rural Rakai District, Uganda. AIDS 1992 Sep;6(9):983-989.

8. Nwosu DC, Anosike JC, Nwoke BE, Uwaezuoke JC. Epidemiological assessment of vesical schistosomiasis in Bende local government area of Abia State, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ Management. 2005;10:55-60.

9. Stoever K, Molyneux D, Hotez P, Fenwick A. HIV/AIDS, schistosomiasis, and girls. Lancet 2009 Jun;373(9680):2025-2026.

10. Ndhlovu PD, Mduluza T, Kjetland EF, Midzi N, Nyanga L, Gundersen SG, et al. Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis and HIV in females living in a rural community of Zimbabwe: does age matter? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2007 May;101(5):433-438.

11. Kallestrup P, Zinyama R, Gomo E, Butterworth AE, van Dam GJ, Erikstrup C, et al. Schistosomiasis and HIV-1 infection in rural Zimbabwe: implications of coinfection for excretion of eggs. J Infect Dis 2005 Apr;191(8):1311-1320.

12. Okwori EE, Alao OO. Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis among AIDS patients in Otukpo, Benue State.Inter J Third world Med. 2009; 8 (1).

13. Onyenekwe CC, Ukibe N, Meludu SC, Ilika A, Aboh N, Ofiaeli N, et al. Prevalence of malaria as co-infection in HIV-infected individuals in a malaria endemic area of southeastern Nigeria. J Vector Borne Dis 2007 Dec;44(4):250-254.

14. Kaye D. Antibacterial activity of human urine. J Clin Invest 1968 Oct;47(10):2374-2390.

15. Okoli CG, Iwuala MO. The prevalence, intensity and clinical signs of urinary schistosomiasis in Imo state, Nigeria. J Helminthol 2004 Dec;78(4):337-342.